Reynolds v

Works, Answer Key The federal law outlawing polygamy in the US or any of its territories.

reynolds v reynolds

The assignments of error are set out in the opinion of the court. Pursuant to the constitution, the legislature consisted of representatives and 35 senators for the State's 67 counties and senatorial districts; each county was entitled to at least one representative; each senate district could have only one member, and no county could be divided between two senate districts.

The Court held that evidence Amelia Jane Schofield, Reynold's second wife, gave during an earlier trial of Reynolds for the same offense but under a different indictment was admissible.

Reynolds v united states 98 us 145 1879 ): 164

This, they claimed, effectively made their votes count for less. The testimony shows that the absent witness was the alleged second wife of the accused; that she had testified on a former trial for the same offence under another indictment; that she had no home, except with the accused; that at some time before the trial a subpoena had been issued for her, but by mistake she was named as Mary Jane Schobold; that an officer who knew the witness personally went to the house of the accused to serve the subpoena, and on his arrival inquired for her, either by the name of Mary Jane Schofield or Mrs. In Connecticut, Vermont, Mississippi, and Delaware, apportionment was fixed by the states' constitutions , which, when written in the late eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, could not have imagined the possibility of rural depopulation as was to occur during the first half of the century. In the face of all this evidence, it is impossible to believe that the constitutional guaranty of religious freedom was intended to prohibit legislation in respect to this most important feature of social life. The Apportionment Cases. Jefferson County was given 17 House seats, an addition of 10, and Mobile County was allotted eight, an increase of five. Sanders, supra, we stated: "We think the analogies to the electoral college, to districting and redistricting and to other phases of the problems of representation in state or federal legislatures or conventions, are inapposite. The first amendment to the Constitution expressly forbids such legislation…. Government could exist only in name under such circumstances. IV, Sec. This is an essential part of the concept of a government of laws, and not men. An opinion based merely upon a hypothetical case, as that 'if so and so is true, the prisoner is guilty,' is not always sufficient; but where the opinion is as to the actual fact of guilt or innocence, it is a disqualification, according to all the authorities. His wife was Mary Ann Tuddenham. For instance, South Carolina had elected one state senator from each county. On March 29, , just three days after this Court had decided Baker v.

In the Nevada Senateseventeen members represented as many asor as few as people. The Court's Decision The Supreme Court had little trouble seeing the practical effect of malapportioned legislative districts. At ten o'clock that morning the case was again called; and the foregoing facts being made to appear, the court ruled that evidence of what the witness had sworn to at the former trial was admissible.

Reynolds v

As this contest goes on, they multiply, and there are pure-minded women and there are innocent children, innocent in a sense even beyond the degree of the innocence of childhood itself. This is in the teeth of the ruling in United States v.

reynolds vus 1879 )-- religion does not supersede federal law

In considering such questions in a reviewing court, we ought not to be unmindful of the fact we have so often observed in our experience, that jurors not unfrequently seek to excuse themselves on the ground of having formed an opinion, when, on examination, it turns out that no real disqualification exists.

Rated 5/10 based on 1 review
Reynolds v. United States