Faulkner speech analysis

he writes not of the heart but of the glands

When one listens to the speech, Faulkner rarely varies his tone at all throughout the entire length. Even so, the weight of his words was not lost upon the listeners; indeed, it has itself prevailed throughout the decades. President Truman approved the research and development of the hydrogen bomb that year as well, which signaled that this arms race would only grow more and more in destructive capability in the years to follow.

William Faulkner took the stage at the Nobel Peace Prize Banquet in December of that year to speak on the fear that gripped the nation.

I decline to accept the end of man meaning

Faulkner was a writer, not an orator, and it is made apparent. There is only the question: When will I be blown up? William Faulkner took the stage at the Nobel Peace Prize Banquet in December of that year to speak on the fear that gripped the nation. With all the uncertainty in the post-WWII world, these words would have struck at the core of many people, as fear was and would become a great part of their daily lives. He writes not of love but of lust, of defeats in which nobody loses anything of value, of victories without hope and, worst of all, without pity or compassion. It had just witnessed two of the most ferocious and terrifying wars in the history of man, leaving no country unscathed by the terror, bloodshed, or overwhelming melancholy that gripped the world. Because of this, the young man or woman writing today has forgotten the problems of the human heart in conflict with itself which alone can make good writing because only that is worth writing about, worth the agony and the sweat. It is easy enough to say that man is immortal simply because he will endure: that when the last dingdong of doom has clanged and faded from the last worthless rock hanging tideless in the last red and dying evening, that even then there will still be one more sound: that of his puny inexhaustible voice, still talking. These seemed very relevant to the analysis of the speech and allowed an understanding of why this made it effective. So, the use of evidence is definitely strong. His words are a firm reminder of how important the daily endeavors of the soul can be for the whole of human history. Faulkner creates a dystopia in which humans merely endure in a frightening and cruel world filled with meaningless acts that leave us without any hope for the future. This world is not too far off from the one that everyone knew could result from a nuclear war with the Soviet Union.

The same words that he chooses to repeat are also words which reflect strong emotion. These seemed very relevant to the analysis of the speech and allowed an understanding of why this made it effective.

I decline to accept the end of man. There is only the question: When will I be blown up? After World War II ended in the tentativeness of peace, two world powers stared at each other from opposite sides of an iron curtain.

Nobel speech

Words like sacrifice and love show us that Faulkner is writing in a very serious tone. I think the ideas you presented in the last few sentences should probably be condensed down into one or two sentences to understand the thesis. An uncomfortably noticeable aspect of the deliverance is his pacing. I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. So, the use of evidence is definitely strong. This was a time when humanity was still disjointed, and the future worse than uncertain. His griefs grieve on no universal bones, leaving no scars. Even so, his delivery to the audience that night left the world with an emotional reminder of what the human spirit is capable of. All of the stylistic elements that Faulkner uses in his essay come together to display his purpose. Faulkner was a writer, not an orator, and it is made apparent. Even so, the tone of his deliverance does not necessarily reinforce the themes of strength, resilience, and perseverance that the words contain. William Faulkner took the stage at the Nobel Peace Prize Banquet in December of that year to speak on the fear that gripped the nation. People do not take words like endurance and courage lightly, because these words evoke emotions and memories.

He makes it apparent that through literature humans can all know that they do not struggle alone, in fact, it is these toils that define us and bring us together as a species. People do not take words like endurance and courage lightly, because these words evoke emotions and memories.

With all the uncertainty in the post-WWII world, these words would have struck at the core of many people, as fear was and would become a great part of their daily lives.

faulkners nobel prize quote

You may also like.

Rated 7/10 based on 28 review
Download
Analysis of William Faulkners Nobel Prrize of Literarure